Isle of May National Nature Reserve - Annual Report 2024
Contents
- 1. Introduction
-
2. Biological recording
- 2.1 Introduction to breeding seabirds
- 2.2 Population monitoring of cliff-nesting seabirds
- 2.3 Results of cliff-nesting seabirds
- 2.4 Population monitoring of ground-nesting seabird species
-
2.5 Other breeding birds
- 2.5.1 Shelduck (Tadorna tadorna)
- 2.5.2 Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos)
- 2.5.3 Oystercatcher (Haematopus ostralegus)
- 2.5.4 Feral pigeon (Columba livia domestica)
- 2.5.5 Swallow (Hirundo rustica)
- 2.5.6 Rock pipit (Anthus petrosus)
- 2.5.7 Pied wagtail (Motacilla alba)
- 2.5.8 Carrion crow (Corvus corone)
- 2.5.9 Peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus)
- 2.5.10 Wood pigeon (Columba palumbus)
- 2.6 Migrant birds
- 2.7 Mammals
- 2.8 Lepidoptera
- 3. Research and monitoring
- 4. Visitor review
- 5. Media coverage
- 6. Volunteers and support
- 7. Infrastructure and island work
- 8. Weather
1. Introduction
The Isle of May National Nature Reserve (NNR) was staffed by the NatureScot team from March until November. Reserve Manager David Steel returned for his tenth season and Assistant Reserve Manager Thomas Skinner returned for his second season. Other organisations involved in working on the NNR include the Isle of May Bird Observatory; the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (UKCEH); Edinburgh University; Manchester University; St Andrews University; the Royal society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) and the various boat operators bringing daily visitors to the island.
The seabird breeding season had its highs and lows, with European shags suffering a catastrophic drop in numbers whilst the cliff-nesting auks, razorbill and guillemot, also declined. However, there was some good news as the first puffin census in seven years showed an increase in number whilst the terns returned to nest on the island following last season’s blank year. The summer was HPAI-free although it was detected in early October whilst prey availability appeared to drop for the nesting seabirds in mid-July. The visitor season was disrupted by poor weather throughout the summer although numbers remained high, with 15,000 visitors between April-September. The grey seal season was slow to start and numbers appeared lower than usual, part of a slow decline in the population levels on the island.
Map showing locations for birdwatching, information, the Visitor Centre, landings, picnic area, toilets and viewpoints.
View a larger version of this map.
1.1 Acknowledgements
The information and data collected for this report came from a variety of sources, including the NatureScot team of David Steel, Thomas Skinner, Bella Allan, Hayley Bannister and Shem Weekes; the UKCEH team of Mark Newell, Josie Hewitt, Francis Daunt, Erin Taylor, Ella Benninghaus and Carrie Gunn; and the Edinburgh University team of Chiara D’Avino and Eve Sharples. Also, thanks to the Isle of May Bird Observatory Trust and members, various boatmen and others who contributed throughout the season.
2. Biological recording
2.1 Introduction to breeding seabirds
The Isle of May is one of four strategic seabird monitoring sites around the UK, part of the JNCC’s national long-term seabird monitoring programme. The other sites are Skomer, Canna and Fair Isle. The status of seabirds on the Isle of May is also reported to NatureScot for the assessment of qualifying species within the Firth of Forth Special Protection Area. The seabird monitoring programme is completed by NatureScot working alongside UKCEH. This monitoring work makes up the core part of NatureScot’s NNR management work. UKCEH contributes to the seabird monitoring on the Isle of May, under contract to the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO).
NatureScot staff complete the whole island breeding seabird counts. Every year, reserve staff count the number of breeding cliff-nesting seabirds (fulmar, shag, kittiwake, razorbill and guillemot) and nesting tern species. Staff count the number of breeding ground-nesting seabirds (large gulls, puffins and eiders) every two years. Puffins are now being counted every second year rather than every five years to provide greater detail about status and trends of the puffin colony. NatureScot staff on the island also carry out productivity work for Arctic tern and great black-backed gull (the number of chicks raised per pair). Every year, UKCEH monitors the productivity, return rate, survival and food intake of the auks (guillemot, puffin and razorbill), shags, fulmar and kittiwakes. Other island partners such as the Isle of May Bird Observatory Trust (IOMBOT), Edinburgh University, BTO and St Andrews University provide data on seabird phenology, the date of first eggs laid and chicks hatched.
Summary of breeding seabirds in 2024
Commencement of the breeding was slow in many species. The winter period 2023/24 saw a number of named storms, some of them arriving in quick succession. Prolonged easterly winds and high swell continued right through to the start of the breeding season, causing breeding to be delayed for most species and particularly late for European shags. The guillemot cliffs were patchy and attendance was low to begin with. Best practice protocols were followed for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) all season and there were no confirmed cases of HPAI during the summer months. However, in early October, H5N5 was confirmed in a small group of dead great black-backed gulls on Rona on the north end of the island. The strain H5N1 had been causing problems in recent years but this was the first confirmed case on the island of the H5N5 strain. This followed the pattern of the virus which originated in the northern islands in late summer in the same species and eventually reached the Isle of May in early October. Thankfully, the impact was small as it was outside the main breeding season.
Following all-island counts in May, we saw an increase in:
- puffins (increase from 2017 census)
- kittiwakes (fifth year of increase), and
- cormorants (fifth year of increase)
And a decrease in:
- shag (catastrophic reduction in breeding pairs)
- guillemot (third year of declines)
- razorbill (third year of declines)
- fulmar (third year of decrease)
2.2 Population monitoring of cliff-nesting seabirds
2.2.1 Sections and timings
It is challenging and time-consuming to count cliff-nesting seabirds as the colonies are very busy with birds coming and going and often nesting in inaccessible locations. To capture a snapshot of the Isle of May breeding populations, the breeding birds are counted once during the first ten days of June. The island is divided into the same standardised count sections that have been used in previous years and all cliff-nesting species are counted. Counts from sea (using boat) were added in 2018 to count birds nesting in caves and areas inaccessible from land and included in the all-island population counts. Most of the all-island count was carried out by David Steel from 1-8 June. Mark Newell, UKCEH, counted sections that are sensitive, to avoid disturbing shags. Every year, the monitoring methodology is kept consistent to allow comparison to past counts. The methodology for the five cliff-nesting bird species (guillemot, razorbill, kittiwake, fulmar and shag) is set out in the Isle of May Monitoring Handbook (NatureScot, 2001, revised 2002, 2011, 2021).
2.2.2 Cornerstone plot counts
It is difficult to estimate the actual number of breeding pairs by counting the number of birds on the cliff face because the attendance of auks (razorbill and guillemot) on the cliffs can vary over the course of a day. This is overcome by converting individual counts of birds from the all-island cliff count into pairs using a known k-value. The k-value is the difference between the number of individuals counted at the cornerstone cliff plot at the beginning of an all-island count session and the number of actual breeding pairs known to be breeding at the cornerstone cliff plot from detailed observations made by UKCEH. By multiplying this k-value with the number of individual auks counted during the all-island counts, the total number of pairs across the island can be estimated.
2.3 Results of cliff-nesting seabirds
Key tables for breeding seabirds can be found in Annex 1 - quick reference guide:
- Table 6: Phenology (key breeding dates) for breeding seabird species
- Table 7: Seabird population numbers for the six key seabird species since 2019
- Table 8: All-island count of the breeding population of cliff-nesting species by section
- Table 9: Survival rates of the six key breeding seabird species (data provided by UKCEH)
- Table 10: Productivity of the six key breeding seabird species (data provided by UKCEH)
- Table 11: Population counts of the main seabird species, 1980-2024
2.3.1 Fulmar (Fulmarus glacialis)
We recorded 276 apparently occupied sites (AOS) in 2024 (Figure 2).
Bar chart showing number of apparently occupied sites for fulmar from 1980 to 2024, except for 1981, 1982, 1987,1988 and 2022. Year is along the x axis, from 1980 to 2024, and number of apparently occupied sites is along the y axis, with a scale that runs from 0 to 450. Counts are quite variable but have shown an overall increase. A visual representation of some of the data from Table 11, which gives figures for fulmar, shag, kittiwake, guillemot, razorbill and puffin.
The number of breeding fulmars declined by 12% from 314 AOS in 2023 and less than the five-year average of 310 AOS. The first incubating fulmar was discovered on 13 May, the first chick on 7 July and the first chicks fledging on 23 August. Productivity was 0.37 chicks per nest, similar to last year, which was the lowest since 2012.
2.3.2 Shag (Phalacrocorax aristotelis)
We recorded 127 apparently occupied nests (AON) in 2024 (figure 3).
Bar chart showing number of apparently occupied nests for European shag from 1980 to 2024, except for 2022. Year is along the x axis, from 1980 to 2024, and number of apparently occupied nests is along the y axis, with a scale that runs from 0 to 2,500. Counts are quite variable and show an overall decline. A visual representation of some of the data from Table 11, which gives figures for fulmar, shag, kittiwake, guillemot, razorbill and puffin.
This season, the Isle of May recorded the lowest number of breeding shags on record, declining by 81% from 674 pairs in 2023. This is much less than the five-year average of 512 AON. The decline in shags was linked to mortality from the many North Sea storms over winter and spring (see Weather, Section 9) when birds were unable to forage and died of starvation. The first egg was discovered on 19 April. This was a month later than 2023 (20 March), about the same time as the first chick in 2023 (21 April), suggesting the shags were in poor body condition following winter. The first chick was discovered on 24 May and the first fledged on 28 June. Nesting productivity was 1.64 chicks per nest (1.81 in 2023).
2.3.3 Kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla)
We recorded 5,443 apparently occupied nests (AON) in 2024 (Figure 4).
Bar chart showing the number of apparently occupied nests for kittiwake from 1983 to 2024, except for 2022. Year is along the x axis, from 1983 to 2024, and number of apparently occupied nests is along the y axis, with a scale running from 0 to 9,000. Counts are quite variable. A visual representation of some of the data from Table 11, which gives figures for fulmar, shag, kittiwake, guillemot, razorbill and puffin.
The number of breeding kittiwakes remained similar to last year, with a very slight increase to 5,425 AON and more than the five-year average of 4,657 AON. This season, there was unusual nest failure in mid-July with chicks observed dead on nests. Some of these dead chicks were swabbed for bird flu but the results returned negative suggesting a starvation event. The chick mortality was also observed at other nearby kittiwake colonies, Dunbar Harbour and St Abb’s Head. Nest building began on 13 May and the first eggs were discovered on 18 May, a week later than 2023. The first chicks hatched from 19 June and the first fledgling was seen on 20 July. Productivity was 0.95 chicks per pair.
2.3.4 Guillemot (Uria aalge)
We recorded 15,506 individuals with an estimate of 13,372 pairs in 2024 (Figure 5).
Bar chart showing the number of guillemot pairs from 1990 to 2024, except for 2022. Year is along the x axis, from 1990 to 2024, and number of pairs is along the y axis, with a scale running from 0 to 25,000. Counts are quite variable. A visual representation of some of the data from Table 11, which gives figures for fulmar, shag, kittiwake, guillemot, razorbill and puffin.
The number of guillemot pairs declined by 13% from 15,314 pairs in 2023, the second year of decline and less than the five-year average of 16,577 pairs. Potentially, the decline in breeding populations could either be linked to adult mortality caused by a starvation event the previous autumn (causing a large mixed wreck of adults and immatures up the east coast) or from adults taking a non-breeding year, an effect of the rough winter. Adult birds on the cliffs were observed in poor feather condition indicating poor feeding conditions during the moult period in late June. As the breeding season commenced, attendance was patchy on the breeding cliffs, those that returned appeared unsettled and there was a high rate of egg loss. The first egg was discovered on 2 May, the latest laying date on record, ten days later than in 2023. The first chick was seen on 8 June and the first jumpling (a term used for a chick which fledges the nest) left on 1 July, with the last leaving on 1 August. There were many eggs and chicks lost to a large swell produced by westerly winds in June. Productivity was 0.65 chicks per pair.
2.3.5 Razorbill (Alca torda)
We recorded 4,892 individuals with an estimate of 3,392 pairs in 2024 (Figure 6).
Bar chart showing the number of razorbill pairs from 1990 to 2024, except for 2022. Year is along the x axis, from 1990 to 2024, and number of pairs is along the y axis, with a scale that runs from 0 to 6,000. Numbers have been quite variable, with an overall upward trend. A visual representation of some of the data from Table 11, which gives figures for fulmar, shag, kittiwake, guillemot, razorbill and puffin.
The number of razorbill pairs declined by 20% from 4,223 pairs in 2023, the second year of declines and less than the five-year average of 4,332 pairs. Razorbills were observed with rump areas worn down to the undercoat during the moult period in late June, suggesting poor feeding conditions. The first egg was discovered on 30 April, one week later than in 2023. The first chicks were observed on 5 June and the first chicks seen jumping on 23 June. Productivity was 0.64, about the five-year average.
2.3.6 Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo)
The colony had 34 apparently occupied nests (AON) in 2024.
The cormorant colony continues to go from strength to strength, having originally established on the North Ness in 2020. The use of a drone allowed an accurate count, with 34 nests counted. Nest building occurred in mid-March and the first eggs were being incubated from early April. The first chicks had hatched by early May and the first fledgling was recorded on 26 June.
2.4 Population monitoring of ground-nesting seabird species
2.4.1 Puffin (Fratercula arctica)
We recorded 52,104 apparently occupied burrows (AOB) in 2024.
The number of puffin AOBs has increased by 33% from 39,000 AOB recorded during the previous census in 2017. It is thought that the breeding population of puffins peaked between 2017 and 2024 and has since dropped. See Annex 2 for full methodology and report of the 2024 puffin census.
Puffins returned to Isle of May waters on 14 March and made landfall on 20 March. The first puffin observed with fish in its bill was on 20 May, indicating that the first chick had hatched. The first pufflings were seen leaving on 27 June. Productivity was 0.77 chicks per pair.
2.4.2 Large gulls
Since 2022, the large gulls on the island have been counted using images taken from a UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, also known as a drone). This new method of counting was implemented to increase accuracy (allowing the large gulls to be counted in situ on their nests) whilst also reducing disturbance to the breeding bird assemblage across the island, as the previous method involved a large team of people walking across the entire island. The UAV allows a composite image of the island to be taken, imported into geo.View and then a desk-based study implemented counting the various nesting gulls.
There was an attempt to survey the gull population on 30 May but due to increasing wind speed, the attempt was aborted, and a new survey was conducted on 12 June. The overall totals are shown below.
Herring gull (Larus argentatus)
Present all year round, with the winter numbers supplemented by birds from more northerly breeding populations in Scotland and Northern Europe. Birds were well established on breeding territories throughout April and nest building was noted mid-month. The first eggs were discovered on 27 April, with the first chicks hatching from 29 May. The population survey revealed a total of 3,009 AON, a decrease from the previous survey. Chicks started fledging from across the island from 2 July and, as usual, small numbers remained throughout the autumn, with 400 counted on 27 October.
Lesser black-backed gull (Larus fuscus)
The entire island population moves south for the winter and the first returning birds were seen in mid-February, with a single on 12 February. As spring progressed, larger numbers arrived across the colonies and the territorial disputes were noted in late March. The first eggs were discovered on 28 April, with chicks hatching by 30 May. The population count revealed a total of 1,250 AON, a decline from 1,739 the previous survey. Chicks started fledging from 4 July and thereafter numbers dwindled and the last confirmed record involved an individual in late October.
2.4.3 Great black-backed gull (Larus marinus)
Present all year round, with influxes of northern birds in the autumn. The island’s small population were on territory by mid-March and the first eggs were discovered on 20 April (15 April, 2023) and the first chicks hatched from 25 May (17 May, 2023). The first chicks started fledging from 10 July. The population survey revealed a total of 111 AON, a slight decrease of 4 nests compared to the previous survey. As usual, post-breeding numbers increased with the onset of the grey seal season as many birds took advantage of dead or dying pups as well as afterbirth in October-December. Interestingly, H5N5 hit a small number of birds in early October, part of a more serious outbreak nationwide.
2.4.4 Terns
Common tern (Sterna hirundo)
There was a total of 5 apparently occupied nests (AONs) in 2024.
The first birds were seen returning from 8 May and small numbers were evident at the Beacon, the traditional nesting area. However, due to a combination of issues, including carrion crow and peregrine predation, the colony never established. However, five pairs attempted to nest but all eggs were lost soon after.
Arctic tern (Sterna paradisaea)
There was a total of 324 apparently occupied nests (AONs) in 2024.
The Arctic tern colony returned after abandoning in 2023 but AONs were less than the five-year average of 453 AON.
The first returning birds were seen on 29 April and by 22 May the colony settled. The first egg was discovered on 24 May, the first chick on 18 June. Unfortunately, no Arctic tern chicks fledged this season as a combination of predation events by herring gulls, lesser-black-backed gulls, and particularly a single short-eared owl took place. On 9 July, the majority of adults departed and by 16 July all adults were gone. This is the second year in a row with no terns successfully fledging.
2.4.5 Eider (Somateria mollissima)
The colony was not counted this year as we are exploring new counting methodology as well as counting biannually in alternative seasons to the large gull and puffin census years.
Small numbers overwintered around the island and gradually birds started increasing from late March. The main island loch was the focal point in the spring as large numbers of displaying drakes were present with females. The first sitting female was discovered nesting next to McLeod’s Path on 19 April. The first ducklings were seen on 8 May and thereafter good numbers of young were seen leaving the islands in family crèches.
2.4.6 Storm petrel (Hydrobates pelagicus)
We continued to establish storm petrel breeding range, using a hybrid of monitoring methodologies: passive acoustic monitoring, playback and detection dogs. Three storm petrel chicks were ringed, the first chicks ever to be ringed on the Isle of May and potentially the first on the east coast of Scotland. Sophie Bennet of the BTO installed three Passive Acoustic Monitoring devices (audiomoths) to record singing storm petrels within the known breeding area (south of Fluke Street) from 2023 and in new suitable breeding habitat nearby with the objective to estimate the number of singing storm petrels. Detection dogs were brought onto the island to detect scent traces of storm petrels at a new site by the low lighthouse and at the site where they are known to breed. The dogs signalled at 28 burrows, 14 at each site.
2.4.7 Manx shearwater (Puffinus puffinus)
The island supports the only east coast breeding pair of Manx shearwater in the United Kingdom. The resident male successfully paired with a female this year and the first chick since 2016 was ringed and fledged on 7 September.
2.5 Other breeding birds
2.5.1 Shelduck (Tadorna tadorna)
As usual, the first birds arrived in late March and up to eight individuals were present, with pair bonding and displaying noted. Due to the secretive nature of their nesting behaviour (nesting underground), it is always difficult to assess the actual number of breeding pairs. It was considered that three pairs bred, and a family party was seen on 9 June.
2.5.2 Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos)
A total of two pairs bred on the island, with 9 ducklings seen at Bishop’s Cove pools on 6 May, and 4 were seen fledging in late June.
2.5.3 Oystercatcher (Haematopus ostralegus)
Birds were present all year round, with a minimum of 14 pairs nesting across the island (there was no full census this year).
2.5.4 Feral pigeon (Columba livia domestica)
The species remains a common resident, with breeding recorded throughout the year, with 500 counted in October.
2.5.5 Swallow (Hirundo rustica)
Another excellent year as birds returned to breeding areas from late April and breeding pairs were found at the Visitor Centre (x2), South Horn, Fluke Street freezer room, Fluke Street engine room and at the main lighthouse. All six pairs were successful in raising at least one brood, and four of these pairs fledged second broods, some as late as early October.
2.5.6 Rock pipit (Anthus petrosus)
This common resident was present all year round and although the population was not surveyed this year, the breeding population appeared healthy (20 pairs). Pairs were spread across the island and large numbers of young fledged mid-summer.
2.5.7 Pied wagtail (Motacilla alba)
There was no census of the population this year, but good numbers were present throughout the summer, with successful breeding recorded. Breeding pairs utilised stone walls, buildings and natural nest sites as approximately 15 pairs nested, many producing two broods. As usual, the species departed the island with no over-wintering individuals.
2.5.8 Carrion crow (Corvus corone)
One pair were present in the spring and three young fledged on 11 June. Birds remained around all season, including ‘Patch’, the distinctive individual which has successfully bred on the island in recent years.
2.5.9 Peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus)
For the third consecutive year, the pair nested successfully on the island in the same area as the previous season (on South Plateau). The birds were evident from March and vocal displays commenced from late March. Prey items were very varied, from seabirds to migrant birds, and three chicks fledged successfully from the nest in late June.
2.5.10 Wood pigeon (Columba palumbus)
The first breeding wood pigeons for the island were recorded as recently as 2015 and have since established into a healthy population. As in recent years, a total of six pairs bred on the island and at least three of these pairs were ground-nesting, showing the variety of sites the birds can use.
2.6 Migrant birds
The Bird Observatory opened its doors on 6 April and occupancy was excellent once again. The only two weeks not occupied during the season were 20-27 April and 24-31 August. As usual, weather played a factor for groups arriving on the designated Saturday but in general it was a smooth season. The NatureScot team provided transport service of all kit and equipment across the island throughout the year. As usual, the bird observatory members concentrated on recording bird migration through daily census and bird ringing operations.
It proved a tale of two seasons as spring was excellent, producing some noteworthy arrivals whilst autumn was quiet, with just a few highlights. A total of 169 species were recorded, the sixth highest ever annual total.
- 4th - White-billed diver
- 4th and 5th - Spoonbill
- 9th - Great shearwater
- 9th - Great crested grebe
- 14th and 15th - Radde’s warbler
Other noteworthy arrivals included:
- Balearic shearwater: Single on 17 August
- Grey-headed wagtail: Single on 2-4 May
- Wrynecks: Two from 3-7 May and one on 8 September
- Nightingale: Single on 2 May
- Bluethroat: 17 during spring
- Red-backed shrike: 12 in the spring
- Marsh warblers: Singles on 13 and 18-20 May
- Icterine warbler: Four between 21-26 May
- Yellow-browed warbler: Total of 55 in autumn
- Common rosefinch: Single from 22-27 May and record influx in autumn
- Red-breasted flycatcher: Single on 27 May
- Nightjar: Male on 27 May
- Hawfinch: Male on 1 and 2 April
- Hoopoe: Single on 9-16 April
For a full account of bird records, check out the Isle of May Bird Observatory website
2.7 Mammals
2.7.1 Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus)
The rabbit population remained very healthy across the island although it was evident that myxomatosis was in the population during the spring. Originally discovered in rabbits at the south end of the island, the disease spread slowly across the island, reaching the North Plateau area by mid-October. The result was that a large number of rabbits died, with corpses littering the island. This was the first major outbreak since 2013, and next season will prove interesting from the vegetation perspective.
2.7.2 Grey seals (Halichoerus grypus)
The grey seal season was very slow to start, mirroring the previous year. The first pup was discovered on 7 October and it was a poor start, with the first eleven pups all succumbing at an early age. However, the colonies soon became occupied although it was evident that numbers were lower than usual. Ground counts undertaken on 5 November to compare with counts on the same date in recent years revealed a drop of 49% on the previous count on the same dates in 2022 and 2021. This drop might have been due to a number of factors, including a late start to the season. However, this is continuing the trend of a slow decrease in the size of the Isle of May grey seal colony.
| Location | 5 Nov 2024 | 5 Nov 2022 | 5 Nov 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pilgrim’s Haven | 23 | 34 | 36 |
| Tennis Courts | 11 | 56 | 31 |
| Ardcarran | 164 | 215 | 152 |
| Mill Door | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Horse Hole | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| East Side | 2 | 5 | 4 |
| Burnopps Leap | 36 | 47 | 34 |
| Rona | 138 | 406 | 462 |
| Total | 381 | 771 | 728 |
2.7.3 Cetaceans
It was another good season for cetacean sightings (cetaceans are aquatic mammals that include whales, dolphins, and porpoises) as a total of six species were recorded in the surrounding seas. Annual cetacean counts typically return only 3-4 species, with minke whale (17 out of the last 18 years), harbour porpoise (16 out of the last 18 years) and bottle-nosed dolphin (13 out of the last 18 years) the island’s most regular reported. The months of August and September proved (once again) to be the most productive months.
Minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata)
This season, minke whales were the most frequently sighted cetacean, with records on 22 dates (33 dates in 2023) and typically most were seen during August (8 days) and September (4 days). The first of the year was noted in early May with a single on 10-11 May followed by the same animal on four dates from 24-31 May. The majority of sightings involved single animals, with reports on 17, 19 and 27 June and eight dates in August. Peak counts included four on 4 September and three on 4 October.
Harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena)
There were reports on 14 dates (28 in 2023) across the season and the poor weather of summer (windy conditions on the vast majority of dates) did not help recording. Records were noted on three May, one June, five August and five September dates. The majority of records involved 2-3 animals but an impressive 40 were seen on 4 September off the east and north of the island.
Bottle-nosed dolphin (Tursiops truncates)
The species is frequently seen along the Fife coastline and reported by boatmen throughout the summer, but these animals are just outside our recording area. The species is much rarer around the island but this year it was well reported, with records on fifteen dates (five dates in 2023). The majority of pods involved 4-20, although counts exceeding this included 25 on 29 September and 35 on 4 October.
Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae)
An individual was seen surfacing off the east side of the island on 8 May and appeared to be a young animal. Reports are increasing from the island as there have been records in 2015, 2018, 2022 and 2023.
Common dolphin (Delphinus delphis)
For the second consecutive year, a pod was seen as 50 animals were noted off the east side of the island on 29 September. This follows on from 60 on 25-26 August 2023. Previous to this, there are only a few records from the island, and this was the first since two animals were recorded in 2016.
Sei whale (Balaenoptera borealis)
For only the third ever occasion (although the second consecutive year), the island produced a record. A large animal surfaced close to the north-east corner of the island on 28 August and was seen feeding north of the island later that day. This is only the third ever record following individuals in 2023 and 2021.
2.8 Lepidoptera
2.8.1 Butterflies
We recorded butterflies using transects for UKBMS as well as casual recording from staff and the bird observatory. Nine species were recorded on the island from April – May (average 10 species seen per season). The seven most common species included red admiral, small tortoiseshell, small white, large white, green-veined white, peacock and painted lady butterflies. These seven species of butterfly have been recorded every year since 2007, excluding 2020 when no staff were present on the island due to Covid-19. Red admiral was the most frequently occurring (102 days) and most abundant species (413 records), peacock was the second most frequently occurring (41 days) and second most abundant (117 records). Speckled wood was first recorded as recently as 2017 but has now been recorded in five years since, including an individual in October. A similar pattern has occurred with wall brown, as the first island record occurred in 2018 but it has been seen in six years since, including an individual in August.
| Species | No of days | Total records |
|---|---|---|
| Red admiral | 102 | 413 |
| Peacock | 41 | 117 |
| Large white | 27 | 51 |
| Small tortoiseshell | 27 | 56 |
| Small white | 21 | 25 |
| Painted lady | 9 | 14 |
| Green-veined white | 5 | 6 |
| Speckled wood | 1 | 1 |
| Wall brown | 1 | 1 |
2.8.2 Moths
We trapped moths using a Skinner MV light trap on 27 nights between 4 April and 2 August. The trap was positioned in the principal keeper’s garden and moved under shelter on wet nights. A total of 109 species were identified over the season, comprising 2,456 individual specimens. Marbled coronet was the most frequently occurring species, present on 21 occasions, followed by bright-line brown-eye, present on 18 nights, and silver Y, present on 14 nights. Dark arches was the most abundant species, with a total of 884 specimens counted, followed by marbled coronet with 316 specimens and chrysoteuchia culmella with 142.
We recorded marbled green, Nyctobrya muralis, for the first time on the island. One of the big highlights was the discovery of a convolvulus hawk moth Agrius convolvuli in September, which had only been recorded on four previous occasions (this season being the second season in a row).
| Species | Number of nights | Total caught |
|---|---|---|
| Marbled coronet | 21 | 316 |
| Bright-line brown-eye | 18 | 122 |
| Silver Y | 14 | 17 |
| Eucosma cana | 12 | 40 |
| Cochylis atricapitana | 12 | 39 |
| Dark arches | 11 | 884 |
| Chrysoteuchia culmella | 11 | 142 |
| Agrotis exclamationis | 10 | 50 |
| Setaceous Hebrew character | 10 | 14 |
| Buff ermine | 9 | 42 |
3. Research and monitoring
3.1 Research teams
As usual, research teams were based on the island throughout the year, studying various aspects of the island’s flora and fauna. The research teams totalled 1,023 bed nights on the island, demonstrating the importance of the island for research. During the summer months, the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (UKCEH), led by Francis Daunt with field manager Mark Newell, were present from 17 April until the end of July. The team included Mark Newell, Josie Hewitt and Erin Taylor, supported by Ella Benninghaus, Carrie Gunn and Sarah Burthe amongst others. Edinburgh University, led by Emma Cunningham, had a team of four present throughout the summer months looking at HPAI and European shags. During the autumn months, Manchester and Edinburgh University worked together on the island’s mice, and they were based in Fluke Street from 27 August-3 October and again from 5 November-13 December.
Please refer to Annex 3 for research report summaries.
4. Visitor review
The island opened its doors on 1 April and remained open until 30 September, with planned closures one day per week in the months of May and June, whilst, as usual, boats were cancelled due to bad weather on several dates.
The visitor boats departing from Anstruther brought most of the visitors, with the May Princess bringing 11,018 visitors (11,470 last year) whilst the fast RIB Osprey carried a further 1,610 visitors (1,655 last year). During the season, boats travelled from the Lothian side of the Firth of Forth with the Seabird Centre RIB, Seafari Express, bringing 1,389 visitors (1,417 last year) and BlueWild a further 525 visitors (616 last year). Small private leisure craft, cruise ships (two) and kayaks carried a further 245 visitors, bringing the annual total to 14,787 people compared to 15,603in 2023.
| Month | May Princess | Osprey | Seabird Centre | BlueWild | Other boats | Total | Days open | Days closed | Days cancelled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March | 0 | 46 | 22 | 7 | 0 | 75 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| April | 1,120 | 251 | 158 | 69 | 153 | 1,751 | 18 | 1 | 12 |
| May | 2,144 | 301 | 256 | 151 | 19 | 2,871 | 22 | 4 | 5 |
| June | 2,290 | 271 | 273 | 154 | 31 | 3,019 | 24 | 4 | 2 |
| July | 2,805 | 328 | 324 | 144 | 40 | 3,641 | 29 | 0 | 2 |
| August | 2,067 | 274 | 257 | 0 | 2 | 2,600 | 27 | 0 | 4 |
| Sept | 592 | 139 | 99 | 0 | 0 | 830 | 19 | 0 | 11 |
| Oct | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Totals | 11,018 | 1,610 | 1,389 | 525 | 245 | 14,787 | 141 | 9 | 36 |
| Year | May Princess | Osprey | Seabird Centre | BlueWild | Others |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11,018 | 1,610 | 1,389 | 525 | 245 |
| 2023 | 11,470 | 1,655 | 1,417 | 616 | 445 |
| 2022 | 7,446 | 1,169 | 862 | 138 | 41 |
| 2021 | 7,981 | 1,280 | 1,043 | 98 | 152 |
| 2020 | 2,466 | 328 | 390 | 10 | 93 |
| 2019 | 11,551 | 1,474 | 984 | 0 | 239 |
| 2018 | 11,112 | 1,373 | 1,029 | 19 | - |
| 2017 | 10,385 | 1,349 | 798 | 112 | - |
| 2016 | 9,830 | 1,327 | 743 | 0 | - |
| 2015 | 8,803 | 1,219 | 669 | 0 | - |
5. Media coverage
The Isle of May appeared regularly on various media outlets throughout the year:
- STV television and The Courier carried coverage of the puffin census
- UKCEH podcast ‘Counting the earth’ series, episode ‘Puffin Patrol on the Isle of May’
- A segment about seabird declines on BBC Radio 4 show ‘Inside Science’, episode ‘How green is space travel?’
Social media was again very popular, with the island’s blog attracting a record of 105,051 hits by 46,647 visitors. Overall, 104 different blog posts were posted highlighting the wildlife and the work done on the island. Facebook remained popular, with 5,500 people following the page.
6. Volunteers and support
The island’s long-term volunteer programme continued this season. Bella Allan and Hayley Bannister joined the team working between May and early September, contributing a total of 240 man days. Further help and support was given by short-term volunteers Corin Woodhead, Finley Dennison, Meg Stone and Jaline Wilson, contributing a further 87 days.
NatureScot volunteer groups also offered good support, especially with larger projects including the puffin census, weeding of the priory, open days including the Doors Open day event, tern management and closing down the island.
7. Infrastructure and island work
As usual, various island work was undertaken during the season, dependent on weather and the seabird breeding season. Jobs included:
- Boardwalk extension along Holyman’s path to protect puffin burrows
- Main road and Kirkhaven jetty concreting following damage with Storm Ciaran in October 2023
- Painting of interior of the South Horn
- Grey water pipe replaced and painted
- All chimneys relined in all three buildings in Fluke street
- All showers repaired
- New water tank installed behind engine shed (moved from Visitor Centre)
- Exhibition room in lighthouse painted
7.1 Water supply
Water continued to be a problem for island life this season. Drinking water is extracted from a well which does not replenish over the dry summer months and June, July and September were very dry months (See section 8.5: Rainfall).
7.2 Boat activity around the island
Boating activity was recorded around the island by the island residents from the end of May to the end of July. It is important to note that this was based on incidental sightings, recorded by varying numbers of island residents while engaged in other tasks, and is by no means a complete record of all boat activity in these months. Despite this, a total of 13 incidences of boats coming within the voluntary limit of 50m from the island were observed: four leisure crafts and nine fishing vessels, mostly creel boats setting lobster pots and one vessel trawling for mackerel.
8. Weather
During the 2023/2024 season, we have, for the first time, been able to collect hourly weather observations directly on the island from professional-grade weather stations. Two Davis Vantage Pro stations were installed in mid-2023 (acquired through the Isle of May Mouse Project), with ongoing maintenance, data collection and data processing facilitated by a NatureScot weather volunteer role. The stations monitor air temperature, rainfall, humidity, wind speed and wind direction. Two further sub-modules monitor ground temperature and moisture at two depths. We now have a full 12-month record which allows a number of insights to be made.
8.1 General climate
Comparison with nearby observations on the mainland (Leuchars Met Office station, Fife) for the 2023/2024 season show that the island generally experiences less extreme temperature variations (cold periods are milder, hot days are cooler) and significantly higher wind speeds (gusts frequently exceed 50 mph). There are also indications that the island experiences less rainfall compared to nearby coastal areas.
8.2 Wind direction
While the predominant wind direction on the island is westerly or south westerly, we have seen significant variation on a monthly basis. Specifically, October 2023 and March, April, May and September 2024 saw a significant fraction of winds arriving from easterly directions.
8.3 Wind speed
The 2023/2024 season saw a large number of named storms, some of them arriving in quick succession. Many of these can be seen directly in the wind speed record for the island. Storms Babet, Gerrit, Isha and Kathleen were particularly keenly felt, with wind speeds reaching 85 mph during storm Isha in January.
8.4 Temperature
We did not see temperature extremes on the island, with a maximum of 23°C in August 2024, and temperatures dropping just below freezing on only one occasion in January 2024.
8.5 Rainfall
Observed rainfall appears to vary quite considerably on a local scale around the coastline of Fife and East Lothian, making direct observations on the island particularly valuable. Rainfall on the island appears to be most similar to (although somewhat lower than) the SEPA observations at St Monans, located approximately 13 km ENE from the island on the Fife coast. Using this as a reference point, we are able to infer how typical the rainfall in the current season was compared to the long-term (2014-2023) average.
Total rainfall on the island appears to have been a little higher than average; however, there was significant monthly variability. The months of October and December 2023 and April 2024 were significantly wetter than average, while June, July and September 2024 were significantly drier. Since these are some of the busiest months on the island, this dry spell resulted in quite a strain on island water resources. September in particular saw an extended dry spell with rainfall of less than a quarter of the long-term average. This resulted in critical water shortages towards the end of the month.
ANNEX 1: Seabird data
You can download this information in the spreadsheet at the foot of the page.
ANNEX 2: Puffin census 2024
Executive summary
Puffins are a qualifying species for the Forth Islands Special Protection Area (SPA). An up-to-date assessment of numbers is made biennially to fulfil requirements of Site Condition Monitoring. The puffin population on the Isle of May in 2024 was estimated at 52,000 apparently occupied burrows (95% confidence intervals: 44846, 62123). This estimate is higher than the last count in 2017 (39,200 CI 32,200 - 46,300). The estimate for the change in the number of occupied puffin burrows from 2017 to 2024 was 12,962 (95% credible interval: 5,199 – 23,229), with very strong evidence for an increase in the number of occupied burrows.
9 Introduction
10 Background – the Isle of May puffinry
The Isle of May National Nature Reserve (NNR) is currently the main breeding colony for puffins in the Firth of Forth and one of the largest colonies in Britain. Puffins are a qualifying species for the Forth Islands Special Protection Area (SPA) designated on 25 April 1990. An up-to-date assessment of numbers is required by NatureScot. A long-term study is being run by the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology monitoring the breeding population of the puffins in the Firth of Forth since 1972, to determine the status (population size and distribution) of puffins on the Isle of May NNR.
10.1 Timeline
- Puffin numbers increased at a rate of 10-11% per annum, from a very small population in the 1950s to 69,300 apparently occupied burrows (AOBs) in 2003 (Harris, Wanless, 2011) when the first standardised census was implemented.
- The census was carried out every five years: 2008 (45, 000 AOB), 2013 (46,200AOB) and 2017 (39,200 AOB), showing an initial decline of 30% since the 2003 census and a further decline in 2017. The substantial overlap in 95% confidence intervals (2013: 38,800 - 53,600) suggests that there has been no detectable change in the population size between 2013 and 2017.
- Since the 2017 census, NatureScot has increased census frequency to every two years to better track population change. However, the latest census was postponed until 2024 due to Covid and then bird flu.
10.2 Methodology
10.3 Timing
The 2024 count was made between 29 April and 1 May. The count timing is important and requires that it takes place:
- after birds have returned and have cleaned out and started to use their burrows
- before the numbers of young rabbits has increased, and
- before the vegetation has grown and obscures burrow entrances
The census was made over three days with as many breaks as needed: day one between 8 a.m. and 7 p.m., day two between 8 a.m. and 6:30 p.m., and day three between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m.
10.4 Isle of May puffin census
The census of puffins is determined by ‘apparently occupied burrows’, or AOBs, which is defined as a burrow showing signs of puffin use:
- fresh digging
- droppings, or
- regular wear
On the Isle of May, rabbit burrows could be misclassified as puffin burrows, but rabbit burrows tend to have larger holes, with more substantial diggings (often with a mound of excavated soil out of the entrance) and characteristic droppings in the entrance.
10.5 Team
Thirteen people were used in the 2024 census, a team of five and a team of seven for the main census, and the efficiency counter, who does not take part in the main census. All members ideally already have experience of working with puffins. Before counting, the team were given a practical demonstration of how to identify an AOB.
10.6 Census
The island was divided into 27 areas based on those used in the biennial count of gull nests (Figure 7). The AOBs in each area were counted in strips. The team of counters spread out at least 5 m apart from one another along the boundary of the area. Each counter had a bamboo cane and a handheld tally counter and the two end counters at each end of the line carried a bundle of canes to mark the boundary of the counted area as they moved up the strip. Each counter searched the 5 m section in front of them by zigzagging slowly along it. Where there was potential for overlooking burrows or double counting them, a cane was used to mark the earth in the entrance of each burrow as it was counted. Once the area boundary was reached, AOB tallies were given to the recorder and tally counters were reset. The line pivoted on the end counter toward the area which had not been counted yet and the counting process was repeated running down the line of bamboo canes which were placed to mark the boundary of the previous counted strip. The end counter who was previously placing canes then picked them up, while the other end counter placed bamboo canes to mark the counted area. This was repeated until the area had been completed. Sensitive areas where counting might cause disturbance of breeding birds, especially shags, were counted by UKCEH staff.
Eight efficiency counting plots (determined by Mike Harris, UKCEH) were delimited with string in 8 of the census areas (Figure 8). The number of AOBs in these plots were counted separately. During the main count, each plot was counted by a different counter. It is important that the plots are counted with the same consistency as the all-island counts. The number of AOBs in these efficiency plots are recorded separately to the area count that the plot is in.
View a larger version of this map.
10.7 Efficiency counting
Efficiency measures are put in place to check the efficiency of the census counting in eight designated plots (Figure 8), that are marked out with pegs and string. Plot size varies with burrow density to keep the number of burrows constant: for example, larger plots in areas of low burrow density and smaller plots in areas of high burrow density (Table 13).
The plots are first counted by an individual involved in the census and then counted by an efficiency checker (Mark Newell, UKCEH, in 2024) who isn’t involved in the census count. The efficiency check is completed alongside the census after sections with plots have been counted.
The method used by the efficiency checker is ‘grovelling’ (feeling inside the burrow, often with a bamboo cane) for adult, chick or egg as well as interlinking or connected burrows with multiple entrances). In some cases, birds have just returned and started to clean/use burrows so there are no nest contents, or burrows are so long that contents cannot be seen or felt by hand; it can therefore be a matter of judgement and experience to determine if a burrow is occupied based on signs of use at the burrow entrance (guano or altered vegetation). To avoid double counting, each burrow that has been examined is marked with blue spray paint.
View a larger version of this map.
10.8 Statistical analysis
In the past, a correction factor for each plot is calculated by dividing the total AOBs from the efficiency checks by the number of AOBs recorded in the efficiency plots during the main count. On balance, more burrows are misclassified (usually, so-called burrows are too short to allow puffins to breed in them) than are overlooked, so most correction factors are less than one. A figure greater than one suggests that burrows were overlooked during the main count.
To obtain 2024 figures, Kate Searle (UKCEH) and Adam Butler, Biomathematics & Statistics Scotland (BIOSS), developed a new analytical approach to obtain more robust results, especially around confidence intervals. Here are the methods extracted from that report:
‘Interest lies in estimating the total number of occupied puffin burrows in both years of observation (2017 and 2024) and in the change in the number of occupied puffin burrows between 2017 and 2024. We constructed a model (see Appendix for full model description) to estimate the number of occupied burrows in each year, the change between 2017 and 2024, and a series of derived metrics to establish evidence that any detected change was a result of a real change in the number of occupied burrows and not an artefact of the changes in observation methods (number of observers, identity of observers) across the two censuses. The model assumed variation in the correction factor between individual observers and years, but not between plots (except insofar as differences between plots arise due to differences between observers). The model accommodates the alterations to observation methods between years, namely that each plot was counted by one individual main observer, but that the whole island was counted in transects by a number of individual observers, including in 2024 some individual observers who did not conduct plot counts. Note that data on the proportion of the count made per individual observer at the island level was not available’.
The new analytical approach was applied to surveys back to 2003, when the equivalent method of correcting the whole count from plot checks was first used. This enabled the analytical team to compare 2024 with previous census years and be confident in population trends across past censuses.
11 Results
11.1 Census
The total (uncorrected) count for 2024 was 56,891 AOB excluding burrows counted in plots. Area totals are in Table 12.
There has been a substantial increase in puffins between 2017 and 2024. The final estimates and confidence intervals for the two censuses are here:
2017
Mean 39141 (95%CI 36627, 41781)
2024
Mean 52104 (95%CI 44846, 62123)
The corrected burrow total in 2024 was 52,104 (95% credible interval: 44,846 – 62,123) (Table 13).
| Area number | Area | Burrows counted | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | West Rona | 435 | 1 May |
| 2 | North-east Rona | 510 | 1 May |
| 3 | South-east Rona | 723 | 1 May |
| 4 | Tarbet flats | 59 | 1 May |
| 5 | Drumcarrach basin | 102 | 1 May |
| 6 | Drumcarrach | 2641 | 30 Apr |
| 7 | Burrian | 7764 | 30 Apr |
| 8 | Colm-Kirkhaven | 6186 | 30 Apr |
| 9 | Ardcarran Gully – Kirkhaven | 1010 | 1 May |
| 10 | Lady’s Bed | 2780 | 1 May |
| 11 | Standing Head | 19 | 30 Apr |
| 12 | Altarstanes- Horse Hole | 402 | 30 Apr |
| 13 | Horse Hole - North Plateau | 349 | 30 Apr |
| 14 | Horse Hole - Three Tarn Nick | 9614 | 29 Apr |
| 15 | Three Tarn - Sheep Well | 3832 | 29 Apr |
| 16 | Sewer Pipe - Sheep Well | 975 | 29 Apr |
| 17 | Sewer Pipe – Craigdhu | 2125 | 29 Apr |
| 18 | South Plateau – Cornerstone | 4570 | 30 Apr |
| 19 | Cornerstone – Pilgrim’s Haven | 2461 | 1 May |
| 20 | South Horn | 663 | 29 Apr |
| 21 | East Braes | 3842 | 29 Apr |
| 22 | St Andrew’s Well | 533 | 29 Apr |
| 23 | Beacon | 3209 | 29 Apr |
| 24 | West Braes | 1513 | 29 Apr |
| 25 | Crosspark | 73 | 29 Apr |
| 26 | Other fields | 67 | 29 Apr |
| 27 | Loch sides | 434 | 29 Apr |
| - | Total burrows | 56891 | - |
| Area number | Area | Size(m) | Count date | Burrows counted | Check date | Apparently occupied burrows | Correction factor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | South-east Rona | 18x19 | 1 May | 62 | 1 May | 67 | 1.081 |
| 6 | Drumcarrach | 11x7 | 30 May | 110 | 30 May | 66 | 0.600 |
| 7 | Burrian | 12x13 | 30 May | 113 | 30 May | 95 | 0.841 |
| 8 | Kettle | 22x10 | 30 May | 124 | 30 May | 93 | 0.750 |
| 10 | Lady's Bed | 14x8 | 1 May | 65 | 1 May | 59 | 0.908 |
| 14 | North Plateau | 17x16 | 29 May | 174 | 29 May | 170 | 0.977 |
| 18 | South Plateau | 30x20 | 30 May | 171 | 30 May | 146 | 0.854 |
| 21 | East Braes | 25x11 | 29 May | 155 | 29 May | 188 | 1.213 |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | Mean | 0.903 |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | Lower 95% CI | - |
| - | - | - | - | - | - | Upper 95% CI | - |
12 Discussion
In general, it was good news to discover that the puffin population had increased on the previous census, although there was a back story. Research by UKCEH had revealed that the return rate of colour-ringed puffins has been below average for the last couple of years. However, on further reflection, it was considered that this was because of positive trends that occurred prior to this recent setback. The counts between 2013 and 2017 were similar, suggesting no upturn after the crash in 2006-2008. However, given the losses at that time of both adults and apparently immatures, it would then take several years for any sign of recovery given they don’t breed until age five or more.
So even though the improvements in survival rates appear to have occurred prior to 2017, it would not be surprising that this wasn’t seen in the 2017 count, with improvements likely to become apparent soon after as the immature cohorts started recruiting into the breeding population. Historically, there was a general trend of a 10% annual increase in population (i.e. pre-2008 crash), and by taking the 2017 figure and on the basis that return rate was average to above average from 2017 to 2021, adding 10% per year gives an estimate of ~ 63,000. This is not an estimate we can present as a formal analysis, but just serves to illustrate how the count for 2024 could have arisen despite puffins having taken a hit in the last couple years which would have knocked things back again to the estimated count of 52,104 for 2024 but still showing an improvement on the 2017 count because of the strong gains prior to 2022.
ANNEX 3: Research project summaries
1. GPS tracking of Isle of May seabirds to assess effects of offshore renewable developments
UKCEH - M Newell, M Bogdanova, E Benninghaus, J Hewitt, E Taylor & F Daunt
Permit Number MON/RP24/3
Neart na Gaoithe offshore wind farm are undertaking GPS tracking of Isle of May seabirds as part of their post-construction environmental monitoring programme signed off by Scottish Government. They have contracted UKCEH to undertake the work. This study will undertake GPS tracking of kittiwakes, puffins, guillemots and razorbills to quantify distribution on foraging trips, overlap with wind farm footprints and, together with work in later years during wind farm construction and operation, the potential impact of these developments on SPA breeding birds in the region. In 2024, we successfully deployed GPS devices on 25 guillemots, 50 kittiwakes, 32 puffins and 15 razorbills. The data from these deployments will inform on the usage of the Neart na Gaoithe wind farm area by these seabirds.
2. Long-term studies of breeding seabirds on the Isle of May
UKCEH - M Newell, J Hewitt, E Taylor, C Gunn, E Benninghaus & F Daunt
Permit Number MON/RP24/2
Following an appalling end to 2023, with Isle of May seabirds hit by a triple whammy of avian influenza, apparent food shortages and autumn storms, it was clear that numbers were going to be severely reduced for many study species and those that survived were likely to be in poorer condition. As a result, UKCEH started the 2024 monitoring season with a high degree of trepidation and concern. This was soon borne out, with the commencement of breeding considerably later than normal and laying very asynchronous. With the exception of Atlantic puffin and northern fulmar, all study species commenced laying later than average, with common guillemot the latest on record. Common guillemots, in particular, were behaving abnormally, with eggs often abandoned soon after laying and very low attendance with few site holders in place to defend sites ahead of laying.
Return rates of individually colour marked birds revealed what we feared, with razorbill and common guillemot at the lowest ever level while European shags were only lower in 1994. More positively, Atlantic puffins and black-legged kittiwakes returned at average levels.
Following a challenging winter, those birds that survive are often in a poorer than average condition and this results in reduced breeding success. Coupled with reports of very low sandeel populations in the winter, the expectations for a good breeding success were low.
However, it was better than feared, with Atlantic puffin and razorbill having an average season while European shag and black-legged kittiwake were above average (although see note below). Only northern fulmar and common guillemot were below average, but the latter was still above the poor years in the mid-2000s. Several common guillemots and razorbills were noted with exceptionally worn plumage indicating that they hadn’t completed their post 2023 breeding season moult or had grown weakened feathers due to poor feeding conditions at the time.
- Northern fulmar breeding success (0.37 chicks per incubating pair) was below average.
- European shags had a successful season (1.64 chicks per pair), well above the average of 1.24. Adult return rate at 16.7% was the second lowest on record.
- Black-legged kittiwakes had an above average breeding season (0.95 chicks per completed nest). However, high mortality was noted in chicks at fledging age, with large numbers dead in the sea and under cliffs. Unless birds were seen dead in nests it was not possible to quantify which had actually failed. Consequently, breeding success recorded is likely an overestimate. Adult return rate (84.1%) was above average.
- Common guillemots had a below average breeding season (0.65 chicks leaving per pair laying). Return rate of adults (59%) was the lowest ever, following the previous low point in 2023.
- Razorbills had an average breeding season (0.64 chicks leaving per pair laying), but the adult return rate (50%) was the lowest on record.
- Atlantic puffins had an average breeding season (0.77 chicks per pair laying). The return rate for adults (80.4%) was only slightly below the long-term average.
3.Over-wintering foraging ecology of seabirds
UKCEH - M Newell, M Bogdanova, S Burthe, E Benninghaus, J Hewitt, E Taylor, S Wanless & F Daunt
Permit Number MON/RP24/5
This project aims to obtain fine-scale data on movements and foraging behaviour of seabirds in winter, by attaching specially designed loggers to European shags, Atlantic puffins, black-legged kittiwakes, razorbills and common guillemots. The loggers record daily location and foraging effort. Detailed data on location-specific foraging effort of seabirds will enable patterns of distribution and behaviour in relation to season and breeding status to be analysed.
The work on shags is a continuation of work commenced in 2002. Following the extensive mortality of shags in autumn and winter 2023/24, none of the geolocators deployed in 2023 or before were retrieved. A total of 12 geolocators were deployed in 2024 which we plan to retrieve in 2025.
In 2024, only three retrievals of geolocator loggers were made from guillemots, with a further 30 deployments. The low retrieval rate was likely due to poor over-winter survival across the population and a non-breeding element from some individuals. In 2024, 20 loggers were deployed on puffins, with 6 retrieved from previous deployments. Of these, one was retrieved from a dead puffin which had been predated by great black-backed gulls in an area of over one hundred predated puffins. These deployments will be targeted for retrieval in 2025.
A total of 14 loggers were retrieved from kittiwakes in 2024 which had been deployed in previous years. A further 25 new deployments were made. A total of 25 geolocators were deployed on razorbills which will be targeted for retrieval in 2025.
4.Isle of May non-breeding season shag resightings
UKCEH - M Newell, M Harris, S Burthe, S Wanless & F Daunt
Permit Number Mon/RP24/1
Seabirds in the Firth of Forth are under pressure from multiple stressors. The effects of these stressors are important during the non-breeding season when most mortality of seabirds takes place. Contaminants and parasites are two such stressors known to have detrimental impacts on hosts. Increasing quantities of contaminants originating from land are found in coastal marine food webs, especially in locations with high human population density and long industrial histories such as the Firth of Forth. Seabirds foraging in these regions are potentially exposed to high concentrations through food ingestion, and European shags (Phalacrocorax aristolis) are likely to have particularly high exposure because of their coastal distribution in proximity to sources of contaminants. Accordingly, results from past work show that Isle of May shags have very high levels of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane metabolites (DDTs) perfluoroalkyl compounds (PFAs) and mercury. However, the demographic consequences of these chemicals are unknown, and there is increasing concern about emerging contaminants such as pharmaceuticals, personal care products and microplastics. Shags are also heavily parasitized with endoparasitic worms, and we know that these parasites impact behaviour and reproductive performance.
Understanding the effects of contaminants and parasites requires a detailed understanding of a bird’s exposure outside the breeding season. Exposure is closely associated with migration strategy – some individuals remain resident on the Isle of May and others migrate to other locations where environmental concentrations of contaminants and parasites may differ. This variation in exposure could in turn have consequences for the survival and subsequent breeding performance of residents and migrants, which is vital to quantify in order to understand the effects on the dynamics of this declining population. Accordingly, we wish to obtain resightings of colour-ringed individuals throughout the non-breeding season on the Isle of May, as part of a wider programme of resightings taking place in eastern Scotland encompassing the wintering range of this population. We will then relate migration strategy to breeding success and survival at the individual level to understanding the demographic consequences of these stressors on this population.
We also wish to collect pellets outside the breeding season to obtain an estimate of diet, which will be used to inform estimates of exposure through ingestion of different prey. This work is funded by a Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Highlight Topic grant on Legacy Waste in the Coastal Zone.
In the winter of 2023/24, a total of 6,639 observations were made of 2,212 individual colour-ringed shags on the Isle of May. This impressive total will form an invaluable analysis along with the sightings of shags made from the mainland over the same period. However, most observations were made in early autumn before the huge wreck of shags along the east coast. With about 80% of the Isle of May population lost along with similar losses at other east coast colonies, the number of colour-ringed birds available for resighting will be massively reduced over the coming years
5.Isle of May mouse research
University of Manchester and University of Edinburgh
The Isle of May is home to a single species of rodent, the house mouse, or Mus musculus domesticus. Usually found in close proximity with humans, the Isle of May house mice seem to be a hardy population, surviving on an island which has not seen continuous human habitation for decades. The mice are spread across the island living in rocky cracks, their own burrows and potentially sharing burrows with puffins and rabbits. Undergoing severe population crashes each winter, from several thousand in autumn to several hundred in spring, these mice offer an incredible opportunity to study what shapes their physiology in a fully natural setting.
A collaborative team from the University of Manchester and the University of Edinburgh have been funded by the BBSRC to carry out a three-year project working with the wild house mouse population on the Isle of May. The Isle of May mice are naturally infected with a parasitic whipworm that lives in the gut, and the way the immune system responds to this infection is key to disease progression and relevant to human populations affected by the human species of whipworm. One of our major knowledge gaps is how a beneficial immune response can be supported to allow the individual to get rid of the infection. The aim of the project is to understand how diet and the microbiome – the bacteria that live in the gut – shape the immune response to whipworm infection.
In order to meet this aim, the team had a first six-week-long field trip to the Isle of May in November 2023, live-trapping mice across two independent sites on the Isle of May, one near the Low Light and one near Fluke Street. One of those grids was supplemented with an overall highly nutritious mouse diet using feeders with small, mouse-sized entry holes, whilst the other grid was not provided with any additional nutritional supplementation.
Measurements and samples of individual animals were recorded across multiple captures over time, to follow any changes in physiology and whipworm infection levels between the two grids. In order to take into account how different seasons may affect infection levels, diet and the microbiome of these house mice, the team will perform field trips in late summer when the population is expanding, and early winter when it is declining, across several years. The goal by the end of the project is to have disentangled the ways in which an improved diet supports health and wellbeing and protects against parasitic infection in the real-world environment in which the immune system operates, with the help of this uniquely isolated population of house mice on the Isle of May.