Wind farm impacts on birds - Use of Avoidance Rates in the NatureScot Wind Farm Collision Risk Model

This document is intended for anyone involved with collision risk modelling for birds at onshore wind farms (e.g. developers and their ecological consultants, NatureScot staff and those within consenting authorities).

1. Purpose

The potential for birds to collide with turbines is one of the main impacts to consider in the development of a wind farm. The NatureScot Collision Risk Model (CRM) (also known as the Band model (Band et al., 2007; SNH, 2000)) provides a method based on vantage point data to estimate the number of birds likely to collide with turbines at a proposed wind farm. This allows pre-construction assessment of collision impacts on local and national populations. As birds may avoid a wind farm (for example some may be displaced from the area, while others may avoid turbines or take other evasive action to prevent a collision), the CRM accounts for this by applying an avoidance rate.

This guidance provides recommended avoidance rates for a number of key species for use in the NatureScot Collision Risk Model. This document is intended for anyone involved with collision risk modelling for birds at onshore wind farms (e.g. developers and their ecological consultants, NatureScot staff and those within consenting authorities). It is updated when robust new information becomes available. This document replaces previous 2010 and 2016 versions and includes an update for red kite.

2. Recommended avoidance rates

Table 1 presents the current recommended avoidance rates for key species, with links to supporting evidence for these. For species not listed in Table 1, we recommend a default value of 98%.

Table 1: Recommended avoidance rates for use with the onshore NatureScot Collision Risk Model for key bird species commonly identified in wind farm environmental statements for which supporting evidence is available. The recommended default avoidance rate for species not listed is 98%.

Species	Recommended avoidance rate	Rationale/supporting evidence
Red-throated diver	99.5%	Furness (2015)
Black-throated diver	99.5%	Breeding birds show similar behaviour to red-throated diver; Furness (2015)
Swans (all species)	99.5%	Increased from previous rate of 98% based on evidence presented in Whitfield & Urquhart (2015), but slightly more precautionary than report recommendation given this was based on a short run of data from one study
Geese (all species)	99.8%	SNH (2013)
Red kite	99%	Urquhart & Whitfield (2016)
Hen harrier	99%	Whitfield & Madders (2006a)
Golden eagle	99%	Whitfield (2009)
White-tailed eagle	95%	Sufficient evidence from flight behaviour and collision monitoring studies in Norway for vulnerability to collisions; see May et al. (2011)
Kestrel	95%	Sufficient evidence from flight behaviour (including hovering) and collision monitoring studies for vulnerability to collisions; see Whitfield & Madders (2006b)
Great skua	99.5%	Furness (2015)
Arctic skua	99.5%	Similar behaviour of breeding birds to great skua; Furness (2015)

 

3. Contact:

If you have any comments or queries about this guidance, please contact Dr Jessica Shaw at the NatureScot office at Stilligarry, South Uist, HS8 5RS, or email: [email protected]

4. References

Band, W., Madders, M. & Whitfield, D.P. (2007) Developing field and analytical methods to assess avian collision risk at wind farms. In: de Lucas, M., Janss, G.F.E. & Ferrer, M. (Eds.) Birds and Wind Farms: Risk Assessment and Mitigation, pp 259-275. Quercus, Madrid.

Furness, R.W. (2015) A review of red-throated diver and great skua avoidance rates at onshore wind farms in Scotland. SNH Commissioned Report No. 885. 

May, R., Nygård, T., Lie Dahl, E., Reitan, O. & Bevanger, K. (2011) Collision risk in white-tailed eagles. Modelling kernel-based collision risk using satellite telemetry data in Smøla wind-power plant. NINA report 692.

SNH (2000) Windfarms and Birds - Calculating a theoretical collision risk assuming no avoiding action. SNH Guidance Note.

SNH (2013) Avoidance rates for wintering species of geese in Scotland at onshore wind farms. SNH Guidance Note 

Urquhart, B. & Whitfield, D.P. (2016) Derivation of an avoidance rate for red kite Milvus milvus suitable for onshore wind farm collision risk modelling. Natural Research Information Note 7. Natural Research Ltd, Banchory, UK.

Whitfield, D.P. (2009) Collision avoidance of golden eagles at wind farms under the ‘Band’ collision risk model. Report to SNH.

Whitfield, D.P. & Madders, M. (2006a) A review of the impacts of wind farms on hen harriers Circus cyaneus and an estimation of collision avoidance rates. Natural Research Information Note 1 (revised). Natural Research Ltd, Banchory, UK.

Whitfield, D.P. & Madders, M. (2006b) Deriving collision avoidance rates for red kites Milvus milvus. Natural Research Information Note 3. Natural Research Ltd, Banchory, UK.

Whitfield, D.P. & Urquhart, B. (2015) Deriving an avoidance rate for swans suitable for onshore wind farm collision risk modelling. Natural Research Information Note 6. Natural Research Ltd, Banchory, UK.

 

Published: Sept 2018 v2

Accessibility:  This pdf is not accessible

Document downloads